Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
От | Dennis Gearon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E9C85F0.2070806@cvc.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL (Network Administrator <netadmin@vcsn.com>) |
Ответы |
high availability (was Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL)
|
Список | pgsql-general |
How much different *IS* one distro from another? Network Administrator wrote: > I've heard that about Debian and SUSE too actually. It still (unfortunately) > comes down to market penetration- even for open source. I just tell folks to > try our a couple of disto or OS' in general an see which one mates to your > personality best... > > Of course I am 3-0 in converting people from RedHat/Mandrake to Slackware. > > *grin* > > > Quoting Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>: > > >>I heard that the debian rev system is MUCH better, but never got accepted >>because of the market weight of RH. Is this so? >> >>Network Administrator wrote: >> >>>When you say "forces upgrades" what do you mean? >>> >>>I might do things differently- I download the tarball, compile, dump and >> >>restore >> >>>my system. I've never have Postgres **not** compile on my Slackware boxes >> >>but >> >>>I've had **tons** of issues with RPM disto's (I've consulted on RedHat & >>>Mandrake personally) with even smaller packages things so I don't use it >> >>much. >> >>>Seems to me you should **always** be able to compile software. >>> >>>-$0.02 >>> >> >> >>---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >>TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? >> >>http://archives.postgresql.org >> > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: