Re: [JDBC] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1
От | Barry Lind |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [JDBC] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E949639.90306@xythos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [JDBC] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres 7.2.1 ("Chris White" <cjwhite@cisco.com>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
It is a setting in the postgresql.conf file. In 7.2 you set the parameter debug_print_query to true (in 7.3 the parameter named changed to log_statement) --Barry Chris White wrote: > How do I do that? > > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Tom Lane > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 2:31 PM > To: cjwhite@cisco.com > Cc: pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org; pgsql-admin@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [JDBC] [ADMIN] Problems with Large Objects using Postgres > 7.2.1 > > > "Chris White" <cjwhite@cisco.com> writes: > >>The first and second are over the same connection. The third is over a >>different connection, but issued after the second transaction has > > completed. > > Oh? At this point I'm prepared to bet that the second transaction isn't > really committed when you think it is. Perhaps the "COMMIT" command > isn't getting flushed out to the backend on time. You might want to > turn on query logging and watch to see exactly what happens when. > > regards, tom lane > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: