Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E7F21CF.8020309@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for advocacy (merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)) |
Ответы |
Re: fairly current mysql v postgresql comparison need for
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > I'm getting beaten up by the mysql users around me because they claim > that MySQL 4.x with InnoDB solves all of the ACID problems, so Pg no > longer pulls clearly ahead. > > Has anyone examined this closely so that I have some nice things to > say about Pg instead? VIEWS Triggers Rules Subselects in target lists* NUMERIC type of arbitraty precision PL/pgSQL, PL/Tcl, PL/Perl, PL/Pythin Multiversioning User-definited data types, operators, and functions Write-ahead logging Partial indexes Functional indexes Rollbackable DDL (CREATE/DROP TABLE, etc.) Absolutely 100% free How's that, for a start? *They apparently added subselects as of Jan of this year in FROM and WHERE clauses. Docs don't mention target lists, they might have implemented subselects in target lists though. Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: