Re: Why PostgreSQL?
От | Medi Montaseri |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E664649.3030002@intransa.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why PostgreSQL? ("Derrick Rapley" <adrapley@rapleyzone.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Paul Ramsey wrote: > > > However, if you *really* want PgSQL to start looking attractive to > managers and PHBs, you'll have to get a big company like IBM or HP or > Sun to start promoting it, as IBM has done Linux. Management-level > technology decisions are made on the basis of *references*. If > management can reference a trusted source who promotes the product, > they can feel safe about choosing it. That trusted source might be > another manager in the organization, or it might be a big > multinational IT company giving a stamp of approval. Would the fact that RedHat has chosen PG on their distribution count ? > > >> My second question is, "Why should I dedicate the time to gain >> expertise in PostgreSQL?" > > > Because it can't hurt, and because unlike Oracle it doesn't take that > long to learn. By all means, learn Oracle too, this isn't an either/or > proposition :) > > P. >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: