Re: GIST_LEAF vs. leaf_key; gist?entryinit
От | Teodor Sigaev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GIST_LEAF vs. leaf_key; gist?entryinit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E632590.5060108@stack.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | GIST_LEAF vs. leaf_key; gist?entryinit (Itai Zukerman <zukerman@math-hat.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
gistPageAddItem doesn't used. Look at mail archive, it was a discussion about keep thes or not. Shortly: gistPageAddItem suppose to recompress entry, but we can't find any reason to do it. One more - gistPageAddItem works only with single-key indexes. Itai Zukerman wrote: > In the examples I've seen, in the consistent method we have: > > if (GIST_LEAF(entry)) [...] > > but in compress we have: > > if (entry->leafkey) [...] > > I can see what the latter's doing, but I'm not sure what GIST_LEAF > does, or why you'd want to use it. > > Also, I noticed this in src/backend/access/gist: > > static void gistcentryinit(GISTSTATE *giststate, int nkey, > GISTENTRY *e, Datum k, > Relation r, Page pg, > OffsetNumber o, int b, bool l, bool isNull); > > and later (in gistPageAddItem): > > gistcentryinit(giststate, 0, &tmpcentry, dentry->key, r, page, > offsetNumber, dentry->bytes, FALSE); > > Isn't the call missing the "isNull" parameter? > -- Teodor Sigaev teodor@stack.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: