Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
От | mlw |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E537F5C.5040301@mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one does it all. (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: The last configuration file patch (I hope!) This one
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Oliver Elphick wrote: >On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 02:43, mlw wrote: > > >>PostgreSQL Extended Configuration Patch >> >> >... > > >>--- Run-time process ID --- >>postmaster -R /var/run/postmaster.pid >> >>This will direct PostgreSQL to write its process ID number >>to a file, /var/run/postgresql.conf >> >>--- postgresql.conf options --- >> >> >... > > >>The "-R" option on the command line overrides the >>"runtime_pidfile" in the configuration file. >> >> > >I raised the possibility of moving the pid file only last week. Tom >pointed out that it acts as a lock on the database to prevent two >postmasters' trying to manage the same database. As such it should NOT >be a configurable parameter. > This is a different PID file. Sorry, this one is specifically for FHS systems. The postmaster.pid file, as used by PostgreSQL remains in the data directory. > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: