Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?
От | Luke Lonergan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D01F47553@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1? ("Luke Lonergan" <LLonergan@greenplum.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What's the best hardver for PostgreSQL 8.1?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Benjamin, > Have you done any benchmarking of the 9550SX against a software raid configuration? Interesting - no, not on SATA, mostly because I've had awful luck with Linux drivers and SATA. The popular manufacturersof SATA to PCI bridge chipsets are Silicon Image and Highpoint, and I've not seen Linux work with them at anyreasonable performance yet. I've also had problems with Adaptec's cards - I think they manufacture their own SATA toPCI chipset as well. So far, I've only had good luck with the on-chipset Intel SATA implementation. I think the problemsI've had could be entirely driver-related, but in the end it doesn't matter if you can't find drivers that work forLinux. The other problem is getting enough SATA connections for the number of disks we want. I do have two new Areca SATA RAIDcards and I'm going to benchmark those against the 3Ware 9550SX with 2 x 8 = 16 disks on one host. I guess we could run the HW RAID controllers in JBOD mode to get a good driver / chipset configuration for software RAID,but frankly I prefer HW RAID if it performs well. So far the SATA host-based RAID is blowing the doors off of everyother HW RAID solution I've tested. - Luke
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: