Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
| От | Luke Lonergan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3E37B936B592014B978C4415F90D662D01995FD4@MI8NYCMAIL06.Mi8.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Dave,
Luke,
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dave Cramer
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:15 AM
To: Luke Lonergan
Cc: Adam Weisberg; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (Have you tried the areca cards, they are slightly faster yet.
No, I've been curious since I read an earlier posting here. I've had a lot more experience with the 3Ware cards, mostly good, and they've been doing a lot of volume with Rackable/Yahoo which gives me some more confidence.
The new 3Ware 9550SX cards use a PowerPC for checksumming, so their write performance is now up to par with the best cards I believe. We find that you still need to set Linux readahead to at least 8MB (blockdev --setra) to get maximum read performance on them, is that your experience with the Arecas? We get about 260MB/s read on 8 drives in RAID5 without the readahead tuning and about 400MB/s with it.
- Luke
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: