Re: embedded postgres
От | Medi Montaseri |
---|---|
Тема | Re: embedded postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E3041F2.50503@intransa.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | embedded postgres ("Rick Gigger" <rick@alpinenetworking.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
What do you mean by embedded ? Do you have a persistent storage ? Flash or disk ? That would be something you'll need regardless. If you have a Flash secondary storage, then the writes will shorten the life of your flash. Otherwise, PG has a very smal foot print and can be used in most "embedded" environment based on what is embedded today... Your questions are really - do you have persistent storage - do you have sufficient ram (PG not requiring as much as Oracle) - There is also the issue of DB Maintenance (vacuumming) that PG still requires it I think in 7.4 the plan is to make that automatic.... Bruno Wolff III wrote: >On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 01:57:39 -0700, > Rick Gigger <rick@alpinenetworking.com> wrote: > > >>Is there an embedded version of postgres that I could compile into a desktop >>app? I would just use embedded mysql but I don't want to GPL my code or pay >>them for a licence, plus all of the code was already built for postgres >>server. >> >> > >You might want to look into this issue more carefully. If your application just >uses a gpl program you don't have to gpl your application since it is a separate >application. If you were actually making changes to the database AND >distributing it then the changes would need to be gpl'd. Even then there >might be a loophole for an embedded modified database server since you >wouldn't necessarily be seen as distributing the binaries if the customers >didn't have access to them. > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: