Re: Perfornamce Q
От | Jean-Christian Imbeault |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Perfornamce Q |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E2F7F1F.5050504@mega-bucks.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Perfornamce Q (Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc@mega-bucks.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Perfornamce Q
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > > I think it's the foreign keys that are hurting you. Are the referenced > columns indexed? They should be, they are all primary keys in the referenced tables. But why would they be hurting me? The update is on a column that has no constraints on it. If the foreign key constraints are hurting me I don't understand the reason ... could you explain why? > Are they of the same datatypes as the referencing > columns? They must be no? Otherwise how could they be foreign key constraints? (And I just checked and yes they are of the same type). > Have you ANALYZEd those tables lately? In the output I gave the first thing I did was a "vacuum full analyze". I have actually found that the time require usually goes *up* strangely enough after doing a vacuum full analyze though ... Jc
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: