Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E2DB494.66915E72@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Win32 port patches submitted (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > "Al Sutton" <al@alsutton.com> writes: > > I would back keeping the windows specific files, and if anything moving the > > code away from using the UNIX like programs. My reasoning is that the more > > unix tools you use for compiling, the less likley you are to attract > > existing windows-only developers to work on the code. > > You think we should drive away our existing unix developers in the mere > hope of attracting windows developers? Sorry, it isn't going to happen. A compromise is a solution that makes all sides equally unhappy ... so we should convert our build environment to ANT? Hey, just kidding ;-) Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: