Re: full join in view
От | Tomasz Myrta |
---|---|
Тема | Re: full join in view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3E23DD82.5050208@klaster.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: full join in view ("Tambet Matiisen" <t.matiisen@aprote.ee>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Tambet Matiisen wrote: > You are right. After disabling seq_scan, it uses indexes just as you > described. Unfortunately my view happens to use subquery: Don't disable seq_scan - sometimes it is better than indexscan. I had the same problem as you - find subject "sub-select with aggregate" on pgsql-sql mailing list dated on 2002-10-23. In my case exposing fields from subquery solved my problem. There is one more problem in your query - coalesce, which possibly disables any indexing in your view. Try to rewrite your view - subquery shouldn't return dor_kst_id and dor_mat_id null. Is dor_kst_id the same as kdt_kst_id and as mat_id? After some database practicing I found, that using the same name in all tables is much more comfortably For each material (materjalid) and koostud (koostud) you want to find some current value (koostude_detaild) and compare it to some sum (documentid...)? I'm not sure if I understand well your view, but here is my version of this view - without subquery: CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW v_tegelikud_kulud AS SELECT koostud.kst_id, materjalid.mat_id, sum(dor.kogus * koefitsent::numeric) AS kogus, sum(dor.kokku) AS kokku, <fields> FROM koostud k , materjalid m left join koostude_detailid kdt ON (m.mat_id = kdt.kdt_mat_id AND k.kst_id = kdt.kdt_kst_id)left join dokumentide_read dor ON (m.mat_id = dor.dor_mat_id AND k.kst_id = dor.dor_kst_id) left JOINdokumendid dok ON (dor.dor_dok_id = dok.dok_id AND dok.tyyp = 30 AND dok.kinnitaja IS NOT NULL) group by koostud.kst_id, materjalid.mat_id, <fields>; One more hint - create two-fields-indexes on koostude_detailid and dokuemntide_read (kdt_mat_id,kdt_kst_id) Regards, Tomasz Myrta
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: