Re: SQL function parse error ?

Radu-Adrian Popescu wrote:

> I'm perfectly aware of the fact that a space solves the issue here.
>
> What I'm saying is that it is not natural nor common to take some 
> whitespace
> into
> account when parsing, since this is not bash language, nor python, as it
> shouldn't be !
> This is SQL, and people who are using PostgreSql write SQL, not
> whitespace-sensitive SQL, bash or whatever.
>
> And besides, like I have already pointed out, look at php's language 
> parser
> (behavior, not source) :
> the statement if(100>$a) is perfectly legal, as it should be.
> Is there any operator named >$ ?
>
> Anyone who has used anything from Mysql to Oracle will get quite 
> annoyed on
> this one.
>
> Hope the people in charge of the parser will get to the bottom of this...
> ... and please forgive my caustic tone.
>
> =====
> Radu-Adrian Popescu
> CSA, DBA, Developer
> Aldratech Ltd.

I think you are absolutely wrong.
It is possible in Postgresql to overload operators and if you want, you 
can create operator named ">$".

There is a lot of useful things in postgresql documentation. If you read 
it, you could find this:
>CREATE OPERATOR defines a new operator, name. The user who defines an >operator becomes its owner.>The operator name
isa sequence of up to NAMEDATALEN-1 (31 by default) >characters from the following list:>+ - * / < > = ~ ! @ # % ^ & |
`? $
 

Regards,
Tomasz Myrta