Re: Threads

>
>
>I am sure, many of you would like to delete this message before reading, hold 
>on. :-)
>

I'm afraid most posters did not read the message.  Those who replied 
"Why bother?" did not address your challenge:

>I think threads are useful in difference situations namely parallelising 
>blocking conditions and using multiple CPUs.
>  
>
This is indeed one of the few good reasons for threads.  Indeed, 
large/robust systems use a mix.

The consensus of the group is that those who do the work are not ready 
for threads.  Which is fine.  Looking into my crystal ball, I see that 
it will happen, though it appears so far away.

bbaker