Re: Version Numbering
От | Douglas Trainor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Version Numbering |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DFA58C5.6080606@uic.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Version Numbering ("Merlin Moncure" <merlin.moncure@rcsonline.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Version Numbering
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
How does the license stop anyone from marketing a renamed product? I looked at the license for pgAdmin II ( http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/pgadmin2.php?ContentID=2 ) and it don't see that explicitly stated. Is it a consequence of (a) anyone must reprint the pgAdmin Public License plus (b) condition 5, that "The names and trademarks of the authors and copyright holders must not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or other dealing in this Software without specific, written prior permission."? So when you put those two together you get the no-rename feature? douglas Jean-Michel POURE wrote: > [...] > > >This is why pgAdmin II & III have a special open-source activist licence. >RedHat will never get pgAdmin and rename it to some stu... name. > >OK, this was just my 2 cents. >Jean-Michel POURE >
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: