Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
От | David Garamond |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DEDC862.1030407@icqmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments ("Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql -- initial impressions and comments
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tino Wildenhain wrote: >>> well, i agree with you that postgresql is stable and solid. one of my >>> biggest gripes with postgresql is that it's not "lightweight" or >>> "simple" enough. some things are awkward/a chore to do in postgresql, >>> while simple in other dbms's. in mysql, i can shut down mysqld, copy the >>> database directory to another installation, and be done with it. ms >> >> And why it will not work with postgresql? Shutdown the database, backup >> the data directory and restart with another option. >> >> Just because you can backup database online does not mean you can not do >> a off- line backup. sorry, i was actually talking about moving one database from one installation to another, not about offline backup. or can i do it with postgresql too? afaik, each database has a unique id (unique to the local installation/the 'template1' database). what if this id collides with the target installation? -- dave
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: