Re: PDF docs
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PDF docs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DEB7D3F.1050801@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PDF docs (Peter Mount <peter@retep.org.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
>>>Who generated the PDF docs for 7.2? Remember how it was done? Is >>>there a script somewhere for it? >>Thomas has always done that in the past. There is some basic info >>about it in the docs: >>http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.3/postgres/doc-build.html >>(see B.3.3), but I got the impression that he always did a great deal >>of manual tweaking in the process. The amount of tweaking went way down in the last couple of releases since I identified the misformed but easily fixed rtf (in the opinion of ApplixWare) generated by OpenJade. Look at doc/src/sgml/fixrtf for a little utility to do that. OpenOffice seems to be happy with the rtf, though I can't remember if I applied "fixrtf" first. However, I did not generate documents for 7.2. Folks seemed to have concluded that it was not a useful feature and were not willing to accomodate it in the release process, so I stopped doing that. Peter E. generated documents automatically for 7.2 (using tex rather than rtf->word processor->ps) and it has the deficiencies noted below as one would expect since they are well known issues to the OpenJade community. The "manual tweaking" is a requirement for high-quality docs no matter what path you choose; hopefully someone will realize that and decide to put in some work. > IIRC tables didn't format correctly (occasionally split over pages). > Also (not sure if previous post made it), the docbook->PDF generated badly > implemented files (~30% bigger than need be) [caused by pdftex].
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: