Creating a framework for the Advocacy and Marketing project to operate with
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Creating a framework for the Advocacy and Marketing project to operate with |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DD32C65.703CA0B2@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Hi everyone, After the email earlier today in regards to the creation of Guidelines and Best Practise documents, people had suggestions (mostly about "it could have been worded a lot better"). Am going to attempt to explain the thinking here, and use this (and the feedback thus far) as a basis for going forwards from. For some time now I've been a member of the OpenOffice.org Marketing team (as have other members of this group). Although not as active in that group as previous, I still watching it's workings as much as possible. One of the thoughts that occurred yesterday is that, from watching the Marketing efforts of the OpenOffice.org team, they've gone from a few people when it was "extremely new and a good challenge" to hundreds of people with weird suggestions (some good, some bad), people all over the board, and so much un-co-ordination that it's only being about um... 5-8% effective action (that's an estimate), and is now very much decide-by-large-committee. It used to be about 75% effective action when it was mostly sensible get-stuff-done people. Additionally they don't appear to have any decent "metrics" in place apart from overall project downloads. There's nothing really in place (with maybe the exception of the new OpenOffice.org User Survey) for measuring, or even attempting to measure, how effective any particular advocacy/marketing effort is, and how it can be improved effectively. There are lessons to be learnt watching that group, both now and into the future. Whilst this email is mentioning some of the problems they're presently facing, the point to it is that we can learn from their experience and not suffer the same pains. We want to be able to measure how effective our efforts are, know what has and hasn't worked, where best to place effort, etc. One suggestion is to start by agreeing on the overall Purpose of the group, then moving on to establishing the principles we would like to become known by, and take it from there. So, throwing the question out to the group, what is the Purpose of the PostgreSQL Advocacy and Marketing group? :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: