Re: Permission on insert rules
| От | Luis Sousa |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Permission on insert rules |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3DD1368D.5040108@ualg.pt обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Permission on insert rules (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-sql |
Robert Treat wrote: >On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 21:40, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >>Josh Berkus wrote: >> >> >>>Luis, >>> >>> >>> >>>>Just a question. >>>>I'm writing some rules to insert/update some data in my database, and I >>>>gave all the privileges on that view to the user, and only select on the >>>>tables. >>>>When that user inserts data using the view, I thought that was user >>>>postgres that will do the rest ! But I got permission denied on those >>>>tables. >>>>The idea was to create a layer, with the views, giving to that user >>>>permission on views to insert and update, and not to tables. >>>>Is this possible ? >>>> >>>> >>>This is a known problem. >>> >>>I know that permissions for Functions has been addressed in 7.3. However, I >>>am not sure about permissions for updatable views. Tom, Bruce? >>> >>> >>Views have always had their own permissions. >> >> >> > >If the functions can fire as there creator instead of there caller, then >I would think as long as the creator has insert/update views on the base >table, you should be able to do updateable rules and give only >permissions to the view for the caller. (Though maybe you have to use >triggers rather than rules to do this?) Does that sound right? > >Robert Treat > > > > > > Is that the only way to do it ? Luis Sousa
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: