Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
От | Barry Lind |
---|---|
Тема | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DB217D9.8050302@xythos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: /contrib/retep to gborg
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I don't object. In fact I have never even looked at this code before now. I doubt anyone else on the jdbc list would mind either, but it wouldn't hurt to ask. --Barry Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > >>Tom Lane wrote: >> >>>Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver. >> > >>It is java, but only tangentially related to the driver. > > > I doubt that either of us are qualified to opine on that point. > Perhaps you should be asking in pgsql-jdbc whether it's okay to remove > contrib/retep. If no one there objects, then I won't complain. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: