Re: speed of server side languages
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: speed of server side languages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3DA1C016.42A202E0@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | speed of server side languages (darkcity@houston.rr.com (Val Ventura)) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > > darkcity@houston.rr.com (Val Ventura) writes: > > I am new to PostgreSQL and I'm looking to port a MSSQL database. I am > > currently working on the stored procedures, and I'm trying to > > understand when and why I should choose SQL vs. PL/pgSQL vs. all the > > others, as far as performance goes. > > For stuff that involves database accesses, plpgsql will almost always > win, because it's the only one we have that caches query plans. It's the only one that does the caching automatically. PL/Tcl has separate commands for preparing and executing plans, and the programmer has to put all the logic into his procedure. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: