Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D9B10D9.2070208@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please... (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: (Fwd) Re: Any Oracle 9 users? A test please...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Mike Mascari wrote:>> >>Oracle isn't processing those statements interactively. SQL*Plus >>is waiting on the "/" to send the PL/SQL block to the database. >>I suspect its not going to take Oracle more than a second to >>insert a row... > > > Oh, I understand now. He delayed when entering the function body, but > that has no effect when he sends it. Can someone add an explicit sleep > in the function body and try that? > SQL> create table foo (a date); Table created. SQL> begin 2 insert into foo select sysdate from dual; 3 dbms_lock.sleep(5); 4 insert into foo select sysdate fromdual; 5 end; 6 / PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SQL> select to_char(a, 'HH24:MI:SS') from foo; TO_CHAR( -------- 11:31:02 11:31:07 Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: