Re: Win32 rename()/unlink() questions
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Win32 rename()/unlink() questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D8B44CC.6070802@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Win32 rename()/unlink() questions (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephan Szabo wrote: > On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Mike Mascari wrote: > > >>I think that's a rather poor description. I think it just means >>that if the file is opened once via CreateFile() with >>FILE_SHARE_DELETE, then any subsequent CreateFile() calls will >>fail unless they too have FILE_SHARE_DELETE. In other words, if >>one of us can delete this file while its open, any of us can. > > > The question is, what happens if two people have the file open > and one goes and tries to delete it? Can the other still read > from it? Yes. I just tested it and it worked. I'll test Bruce's scenario as well: foo contains: "FOO" bar contains: "BAR" 1. Process 1 opens "foo" 2. Process 2 opens "foo" 3. Process 1 calls MoveFile("foo", "foo2"); 4. Process 3 opens "foo" <- Successful? 5. Process 1 calls MoveFile("bar", "foo"); 6. Process 4 opens "foo" <- Successful? 7. Process 1 calls DeleteFile("foo2"); 8. Process 1, 2, 3, 4 all read from their respective handles. I think the thing to worry about is a race condition between the two MoveFile() attempts. A very ugly hack would be to loop in a CreateFile() in an attempt to open "foo", giving up if the error is not a NOT EXISTS error code. Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: