Re: [GENERAL] Memory Errors...
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Memory Errors... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D8A0C40.9060700@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Memory Errors... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Memory Errors...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > I said: > >>Yeah, I see very quick memory exhaustion also :-(. Looks like the >>spi_exec call is the culprit, but I'm not sure exactly why ... >>anyone have time to look at this? > > > On looking a little more closely, it's clear that pltcl_SPI_exec() > should be, and is not, calling SPI_freetuptable() once it's done with > the tuple table returned by SPI_exec(). This needs to be done in all > the non-elog code paths after SPI_exec has returned SPI_OK_SELECT. > pltcl_SPI_execp() has a similar problem, and there may be comparable > bugs in other pltcl routines (not to mention other sources of memory > leaks, but I think this is the problem for your example). > > I have no time to work on this right now; any volunteers out there? > I can give it a shot, but probably not until the weekend. I haven't really followed this thread closely, and don't know tcl very well, so it would help if someone can send me a minimal tcl function which triggers the problem. Thanks, Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: