Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump!
От | Wim |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D89674B.3060306@belbone.be обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Still big problems with pg_dump! (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
Tom Lane wrote: >Wim <wdh@belbone.be> writes: > >>>Hm. Are you running in a multibyte character encoding? I had a note >>>that make_greater_string may have problems in the MULTIBYTE case. >>> > >>Yes, I compiled postgres with multibyte and ODBC support . >> > >But are you actually *using* the multibyte code? What does "psql -l" >show as the encoding for your database? > > regards, tom lane > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > >http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html > > > psql -l shows: List of databases Name | Owner | Encoding ---------------+----------+----------- addressIP | postgres | SQL_ASCII belbonedb_v2 | postgres | SQL_ASCII belbonedb_v21 | postgres | SQL_ASCII peering | postgres | SQL_ASCII peering_v2 | postgres | SQL_ASCII postgres | postgres | SQL_ASCII smsbilling | postgres | SQL_ASCII template0 | postgres | SQL_ASCII template1 | postgres | SQL_ASCII (9 rows) Maybe I should recompile Postgres without multibyte support... Cheers! Wim
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: