Re: pgaccess - where to store the own data
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgaccess - where to store the own data |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D6F9490.9040507@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pgaccess - where to store the own data ("Iavor Raytchev" <iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgaccess - where to store the own data
Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess - where to store the own data |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Iavor Raytchev wrote: > Hello everybody, > > There is an open question we need broad opinion on. > > Currently pgaccess stores its own data in the database it works with. > Some people do not like that. To store it elsewhere invokes a number of > issues such as: > > - where is this somewhere > - converting form all versions to the new > - etc. > > What do people think about this. Is it so bad that the own data is > stored in the database pgaccess works with? > I don't particularly like it. Oracle deals with this by having a database unto itself as a management repository (Oracle Enterprise Manager, OEM, I believe). You register the database you want to manage with the repository, and the metadata is kept there instead of in each managed database. Joe
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: