Re: Remove implicit unique index creation on SERIAL columns?
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove implicit unique index creation on SERIAL columns? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D5EBF72.70405@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Remove implicit unique index creation on SERIAL columns? (Rod Taylor <rbt@zort.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove implicit unique index creation on SERIAL columns?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Rod Taylor wrote: > I'd like to propose dropping the auto-creation of UNIQUE indexes on > serial columns for the following reasons: > > 1. Serials with indexes are quite difficult to handle in pg_dump. It > means that the implicitly created unique index must be destroyed prior > to loading the data, then re-created afterward else risk a performance > hit. > > > 2. SERIAL columns are usually used as the primary key of the table. As > such one must specify PRIMARY KEY at creation time to override the > implicitly created UNIQUE index. > > 3. Consistency with other databases. > > MySQL's AUTO_INCREMENT suggests quite heavily that an index be applied, > but it doesn't appear to do it for you. > > Oracle has SEQUENCES, but it is up to the user to associate them with a > column as per my understanding. At least, thats all I could find. > > SAP -> SERIAL and SERIAL(n). No index is created (creates sequence / > default) FWIW, also MSSQL. I agree 100%. If you want an index, unique constraint, or primary key on a SERIAL, I think you should explicitly add it. SERIAL should give me a column that automatically increments -- no more, no less. Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: