Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D4F0578.9030709@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Well, in fact it's not just a question of disk space. > > The following numbers are stats for total elapsed time of "make > installcheck" over ten trials: > <snip> > I'm not sure about the trend of increasing standard deviation --- that > may reflect more disk I/O being done, and perhaps more checkpoints > occurring during the test. But in any case it's clear that there's a > nontrivial runtime cost here. Does a 10% slowdown bother you? Hmmm -- didn't Neil do some kind of test that had different results, i.e. not much performance difference? I wonder if the large number of DDL commands in installcheck doesn't skew the results against longer NAMEDATALEN compared to other benchmarks? # pwd /opt/src/pgsql/src/test/regress/sql # grep -i 'CREATE\|DROP' * | wc -l 1114 Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: