Hex literals
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Hex literals |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D46B1BA.4CCD39E9@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Hex literals
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I've got patches to adjust the interpretation of hex literals from an integer type (which is how I implemented it years ago to support the *syntax*) to a bit string type. I've mentioned this in a previous thread, and am following up now. One point raised previously is that the spec may not be clear about the correct type assignment for a hex constant. I believe that the spec is clear on this (well, not really, but as clear as SQL99 manages to get ;) and that the correct assignment is to bit string (as opposed to a large object or some other alternative). I base this on at least one part of the standard, which is a clause in the restrictions on the BIT feature (which we already support): 31) Specifications for Feature F511, "BIT data type": a) Subclause 5.3, "<literal>": i) Without Feature F511, "BIT datatype", a <general literal> shall not be a <bit string literal> or a <hex string literal>. This seems to be a hard linkage of hex strings with the BIT type. Comments or concerns? - Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: