Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
От | Vincent Stoessel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D405916.8090202@xaymaca.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | MySQL vs. PostgreSQL (sarah.fraser@cnet.com (builder)) |
Ответы |
Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL
Re: MySQL vs. PostgreSQL |
Список | pgsql-general |
Christopher Weimann wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 04:52:11PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote: > >>For some definition of "useful." You say in your table that postgres >>is slower. How did you measure this? >> > > > In my personal experiance PostgreSQL runs circles around MySQL. > Specifically MySQL makes lousy choices about which indexes to > use and requires me to give it hints. PostgreSQL just works. > > > I use both databases depending on the project requirements. But I find that mysql is more willing to use your indexes than postgres is. I also like that fact that I can tell mysql to use specific indexes if I feel like it. Plus the ability to add ,delete and modify the name and type of any field , table or database is a fat fingered admin's dream. I love postgres, but sometimes the mysql bashing goes way out hand on the list. No war please. -- Vincent Stoessel Linux Systems Developer vincent xaymaca.com
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: