Re: Multi-thread use of a connection
От | Barry Lind |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Multi-thread use of a connection |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D3CC0E6.2090301@xythos.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Multi-thread use of a connection ("Chris White" <cjwhite@cisco.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Multi-thread use of a connection
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Chris White wrote: > The documentation states the jdbc driver is thread safe allowing > multiple threads to share the same connection. The documentation only > talks about queries. So my question is: What if 2 threads are doing > transactions and one wants to commit its data, does this mean that the > other threads data will also be committed even though it hasn't > completed it's transaction or is the driver aware of this? > This is really more of a generic jdbc question and isn't really postgres specific, but I will attempt to answer. The postgres jdbc driver should be thread safe (but I don't believe it has received a lot of testing in multi-threaded situations so there may be some bugs). This applies to both queries and updates. When it comes to transactions and threads, I think you misunderstand how jdbc is supposed to work. The connection defines the scope of the transaction. Threads really have nothing to do with transactions. Thus if two threads are both using the same connection there is one transaction (one connection = one transaction). If either thread ends the transaction (by calling either commit or rollback on the connection) it is ended for both threads. It is for this reason that you generally don't have multiple threads accessing the same connection because it becomes very difficult to keep track of the transaction. thanks, --Barry
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: