Re: dropping anonymous constraints
От | Ben Liblit |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dropping anonymous constraints |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D35CCAE.4060502@eecs.berkeley.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: dropping anonymous constraints (Ben Liblit <liblit@eecs.berkeley.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: dropping anonymous constraints
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Doug McNaught wrote: > '\d' and friends in psql are just shorthand for queries against the > system catalogs. So you're not "stepping outside the language", > really. But the system catalogs' names and organization are themselves PostgreSQL specific. Presumably MySQL and Oracle and the other folks don't have tables named "pg_relcheck", "pg_class", and so on. They probably provide the same facilities, but not in the same way. I guess this is the part I find suprising: the non-standardization of database meta-information. SQL is great for getting information *out* of a database, but seems to have a serious blind spot when it comes to fetching information *about* a database. {shrug} In any case, thanks for the "psql -E" tip!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: