Re: question re internal functions requiring initdb
От | Joe Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: question re internal functions requiring initdb |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D30E131.4030608@joeconway.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | question re internal functions requiring initdb (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes: >>It made me wonder why don't we always create internal functions this >>way, or at least all except a core set of bootstrapped functions. > > I don't believe it will actually work: you *must* add an internal > function to include/catalog/pg_proc.h, or it won't get into the function > lookup table that's built by Gen_fmgrtab.sh. > > It is true that you don't have to force an initdb right away, but > there's an efficiency penalty IIRC (can't bypass the lookup table > search, or something ... read the fmgr code for details). > OK -- I see what you mean now. For a *user alias* of an existing builtin function fmgr_isbuiltin(), which does a binary search on the sorted fmgr_builtins array, will fail. So there is a speed penalty in that the function is looked up with fmgr_lookupByName(), which does a sequential scan through the fmgr_builtins array. Regardless, if the function is not listed in the fmgr_builtins array at all, which it won't be if Gen_fmgrtab.sh doesn't see it in pg_proc.h, then the lookup will fail entirely. I guess I would have found this out on my own if I had carried the experiment out a little farther. Shucks! Joe
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: