Re: URGENT: Performance tuning

Peter Dimov wrote:
>
> --0-1863467882-1024751590=:63919
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>  Hi,
> Curt, you are rigth. I tested it.
> My idea was only to compare postgres with oracle and to see if it is good.
> I got the simplest example with simple data inserting.
> I do not have any answer on my questin:
> Is postgres good as performace compared to oracle and if yes how to fine tune it.
> I readet all docs that Ifound, changed shared buffers and sort chache but can not
> get good result.
>
> And the second question:
> Was enyone from the list a good perofmed postgres and if yes can I receiv this test result.
> If no one had good tuned postgres I do not see the need to use it. For me it can be only "play", demo or...?
>
In many ways, yes indeed, Oracle is better than Postgres, and many other
db's as well.  But it is very expensive, and Postgres is free.  So what
do you want?