Re: SetQuerySnapshot, once again
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SetQuerySnapshot, once again |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D0FCC40.BF2123F3@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SetQuerySnapshot, once again ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: SetQuerySnapshot, once again
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > > I already mentioned an opinion in 2001/09/08. > > Both the command counters and the snapshots in a > > function should advance except the leading SELECT > > statements. > > I do not like the idea of treating the first select in a function > differently from the rest. And such a rule wouldn't let you build > guaranteed-stable functions anyway; AFAIK there has been no analysis where we can get *stable* functions. As far as I see, we can expect SELECT-only functions to be *stable* if and only if they are surrounded by SELECT-only *stable* functions. regards, Hiroshi Inouehttp://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: