Re: PostGres Doubt
От | David Ford |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostGres Doubt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D0F58BD.7070109@blue-labs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostGres Doubt (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Gotcha. 'twas the first time I encountered it, I wasn't expecting it. Thank you for the clarification. I hadn't paid attention to that paragraph when I read over it. David Tom Lane wrote: >David Ford <david@blue-labs.org> writes: > > >>heakin=> \z >>Access privileges for database "heakin" >> Table | Access privileges >>-------------------+------------------- >> interviewers | >> >> > > > >>heakin=> grant select,insert,update on interviewers to heakin; >>GRANT >>heakin=> \z >>Access privileges for database "heakin" >> Table | Access privileges >>-------------------+-------------------- >> interviewers | {=,heakin=arwdRxt} >> >> > >I take it heakin is the owner of the table in question. As such, >he implicitly has all privileges --- the initial null privilege list >is a shorthand for what you see explicitly in the second case. > >The GRANT man page in current development sources has an example about >this; see the Notes section of >http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-grant.html > > regards, tom lane > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: