Re: regular expression question
От | David Ford |
---|---|
Тема | Re: regular expression question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D0EBB8A.8030606@blue-labs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: regular expression question (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: regular expression question
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Yes, and honestly I rather prefer the POSIX syntax in most cases, but I do like some of the shorthands, i.e. < (or \<) is so much easier to type than "[[:<:]]", and the same for > v.s. "[[:>:]]". That's just silly. This by the way is an extension. -d Alvaro Herrera wrote: >David Ford dijo: > > > >>I wish everyone would use the same syntax...it's getting to the point >>where you need a reference book for everybody's idea of how regex should >>be done. >> >> > >In Linux (well, at least in Mandrake) you can look at regex(7) for the >POSIX 1003.2 standard regexes, plus some things Henry Spencer added. His >implementation is the one used in Postgres internally, so it has some >value. > > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: