Re: Is this a bug, possible security hole, or wrong
От | Mike Mascari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is this a bug, possible security hole, or wrong |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D0885E1.8F369ACA@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is this a bug, possible security hole, or wrong assumption? (Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is this a bug, possible security hole, or wrong
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane wrote: > > "Sander Steffann" <sander@steffann.nl> writes: > > But he is right in that his trick works. This proves that views can not be > > safely used for security, which is an important thing to realise... > > A different way to look at it is that the privilege of creating > functions shouldn't be handed out willy-nilly. The trick of hiding > recording operations in a function can be used in other ways besides > this one. Tom, If a user has permissions to write PL/SQL functions, and the statistics collector is running with STATS_COMMAND_STRING = true, could not that user "log" other users' queries using the same technique I described by querying pg_stat_activity? If so, isn't the labeling of PL/SQL (or PL/Tcl, PL/Perl, etc.) as 'TRUSTED' an overstatement? ;-) Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: