Re: PostGres Doubt
От | David Ford |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostGres Doubt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3D07751C.4020602@blue-labs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostGres Doubt ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostGres Doubt
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I.e. "md5" in pg_hba.conf? This is rather disappointing. Here are a few references: http://lists.initd.org/pipermail/psycopg/2002-January/000673.html http://lists.initd.org/pipermail/psycopg/2002-January/000674.html http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2002-03/msg00048.php And finally.. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2002-01/msg00153.php So reentrancy in libpq basically is put on hold until 7.3. David Dann Corbit wrote: >Are you using crypt on the connection? > >Unfortunately, crypt is not reentrant. > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: David Ford [mailto:david+cert@blue-labs.org] >>Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:16 PM >>To: Dann Corbit >>Cc: vikas p verma; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org >>Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt >> >> >>Is libpq/PQconnectdb() reentrant? I've tried repeatedly over >>time and >>it seems to incur segfaults every single time. >> >>-d >> >>Dann Corbit wrote: >> >> >> >>>The libpq functions are reentrant. These will be useful for >>> >>> >>just about >> >> >>>any project. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: