Bug or feature?
От | Kostyuk Oleg |
---|---|
Тема | Bug or feature? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3CE8DAC9.5040502@digma.kharkov.ua обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Bug or feature?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
pgSQL 7.2.1, table with ~590000 rows with next stuct: user_id integer url text .................... -- other fields i do VACUUM ANALYZE, and then have this results: 1) ---------- proxy=> EXPLAIN SELECT count(user_id) AS cnt, user_id FROM stats GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY cnt DESC; NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: Sort (cost=94399.52..94399.52 rows=58842 width=4) -> Aggregate (cost=86383.49..89325.61 rows=58842 width=4) -> Group (cost=86383.49..87854.55 rows=588425 width=4) -> Sort (cost=86383.49..86383.49 rows=588425 width=4) -> Seq Scan on stats (cost=0.00..13873.25 rows=588425 width=4) 2) ---------- proxy=> EXPLAIN SELECT count(url) AS cnt, user_id FROM stats GROUP BY user_id ORDER BY cnt DESC; NOTICE: QUERY PLAN: Sort (cost=155022.05..155022.05 rows=58842 width=51) -> Aggregate (cost=146163.49..149105.61 rows=58842 width=51) -> Group (cost=146163.49..147634.55 rows=588425 width=51) -> Sort (cost=146163.49..146163.49 rows=588425 width=51) -> Seq Scan on stats (cost=0.00..13873.25 rows=588425 width=51) -----------end----------- cost grow by 1.5 times! yes, i understand - this because url column have big width... but in count(url) width of column not important! - but used?... or it's bug of optimizer? or it's not implemented in optimizer? Thx. ps : sorry for my bad english :) -- With best wishes, DIGMA sysadmin Oleg Kostyuk aka Cub (CUB7-RIPE) [BSD registered user #BSD050664]
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: