Re: How much work is a native Windows application?
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3CDA920D.9AF8F9CF@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: How much work is a native Windows application? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
... > PostgreSQL's feature set and price ($0), with a good installer, would do VERY > well. That may be (I'd like to think so!). We've identified at least a couple of barriers to folks running PostgreSQL on Windows. The installer and GUI issue needs to be solved no matter what, and we *could* have a version running on Windows with just those things in place. imho if we are going down the path, we need to take the first steps. And those do *not* require code rewrites to do so (or at least don't appear to). If we had a package available for Windows -- with some developers such as yourself supporting it -- then we could talk about putting more resources into supporting that platform better. But the perception of at least some of the key developers (including myself) is that *if* we did the code rewrite, and *if* we spent the effort to end up as a native on Windows, then we *very well might* be an unreliable database on an unreliable platform. istm that getting a well packaged system running now, then being able to identify *only cygwin* as the barrier to better reliability would get more support for changes in the backend code. And if we were working toward some ability to do threading anyway (I don't see that in the near future, but we've talked in the past about structuring the query engine around "tuple sources" which could then be distributed across threads or across machines) then maybe the next step is easier. My 2c... - Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: