Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3CC7680A.97D4C5EC@tpf.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vote on SET in aborted transaction (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Loftis wrote: > > Hiroshi Inoue wrote: > > >Where's the restriction that all objects in a schema > >must be created in an transaction ? Each user has his > >reason and would need various kind of command call sequence. > >What I've mainly insisted is what to do with errors is > >users' responsibilty but I've never seen the agreement > >for it. So my current understanding is you all > >are thinking what to do with errors is system's > >responsibilty. Then no matter how users call commands > >the dbms must behave appropriately, mustn't it ? > > > IMHO as a user and developer it's more important to behave consistently. > A rollback should cause everything inside of a transaciton block to > rollback. Where does the *should* come from ? The standard says that changes to the database should be put back but doesn't say everything should be put back. regards, Hiroshi Inouehttp://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: