Re: 7.3 schedule

Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> I'm not sure I believe Hannu's numbers, but in any case they're fairly
> irrelevant to the argument about whether a special protocol is useful.
> He wasn't testing textually-long queries, but rather the planning
> overhead, which is more or less independent of the length of any literal
> constants involved (especially if they're not part of the WHERE clause).
> Saving query plans via PREPARE seems quite sufficient, and appropriate,
> to tackle the planner-overhead issue.

Just a confirmation.
Someone is working on PREPARE/EXECUTE ?
What about Karel's work ?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue