Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?
От | Fernando Nasser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3CADD35B.176655C@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What's the CURRENT schema ? ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: What's the CURRENT schema ?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > I really don't buy this argument; it seems exactly comparable to > > arguing that the notion of current directory in Unix is evil, and > > that users should be forced to specify absolute paths to every > > file that they reference. > > You know, I'm kinda surprised that the spec doesn't define a CURRENT_SCHEMA > variable you can query??? > Maybe because it would be the same as CURRENT_USER. For the standard, the schema name used (implied) to qualify objects outside a CREATE SCHEMA statement is a schema name with the SQL-session user id. Except for functions and UDTs where each schema has a SQL-path for searching those (the implied schema must always be in it though). There must be an implementation-defined default for this SQL-path (but the implied schema must also be in it). -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: