Re: ANALYZE after restore
От | Justin Clift |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ANALYZE after restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3CAB367A.4E1DD48D@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ANALYZE after restore (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Jan, Jan Wieck wrote: > <snip> > The defaults after a restore should result in index scans > most of the time, resulting in some medium decent > performance. And PostgreSQL needs some frequent VACUUM > anyway, so after a while this problem solves itself for the > average user. > > A database wide forced VACUUM on the other hand can make > things worse. I have seen scenarios, where you have to > explicitly leave out ANALYZE for specific tables in order to > keep them index-scanned. So what you're proposing is to force > professional PostgreSQL users to wait after restore for a > useless ANALYZE to complete, before they can reset things > with a normal VACUUM to get their required performance back? > And all that just to make dummies happier? > > Jan Nope, I'm figuring that if it's an option, and the option is on by default, then for the majority of people that will be a good thing. Anyone that's a professional PostgreSQL user will know about to turn the option off i.e. pg_dump --something (etc). Sure, we all make mistakes and will forget now and again, but I don't think that should stop us from taking into account that the majority of users out there are fairly PostgreSQL clue-less. If we can make it easy without much inconvenience and without sacrificing the power of the database, we should. :-) Regards and best wishes, Justin Clift <snip> -- "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was less competition there." - Indira Gandhi
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: