Re: Time for 7.2.1?
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time for 7.2.1? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C923841.8F555E9E@fourpalms.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time for 7.2.1? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time for 7.2.1?
Re: Time for 7.2.1? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Well, we were gonna release it last weekend, but now it's waiting on > sequence fixes (currently being tested). And Lockhart may also wish to > hold it up while he looks at the recently reported timestamp_part > problem. (Thomas, are you considering backpatching that?) One way > or another I'd expect it next week sometime. I'll consider backpatching once I have a chance to dive in. It is somewhat complicated by the fact that my code tree is pretty massively changed in this area as I implement an int64-based date/time storage alternative to the float64 scheme we use now. The alternative would be enabled with something like #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP. Benefits would include having a predictable precision behavior for all allowed dates and times. - Thomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: