Re: timestamp_part() bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas Lockhart
Тема Re: timestamp_part() bug?
Дата
Msg-id 3C921F03.65920CE0@fourpalms.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: timestamp_part() bug?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> There is a problem with epoch as well that was not in the 7.1.3
> 7.1.3# select extract(epoch from '00:00:34'::time), now();
> 7.1.3# 34  2002-03-05 22:13:16 +01
> Is that a bug or I didn't understand the new date/time types ?

Looks like a bug (or at least it looks like it behaves differently than
I would expect). Thanks for the report; I'll look at it asap.
                  - Thomas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] Bug #613: Sequence values fall back to previously chec
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: psql and output from \?