Re: BUG #17734: Doc bug: "initial database user" used where "bootstrap superuser" is meant
От | Bryn Llewellyn |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17734: Doc bug: "initial database user" used where "bootstrap superuser" is meant |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C881305-83EA-4FD5-91DA-283EB2230DD7@yugabyte.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17734: Doc bug: "initial database user" used where "bootstrap superuser" is meant ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> david.g.johnston@gmail.com wrote: > >> PG Bug reporting form wrote: >> >> The following bug has been logged on the website: >> >> Bug reference: 17734 >> Logged by: Bryn Llewellyn >> Email address: bryn@yugabyte.com >> PostgreSQL version: 15.0 >> Operating system: macOS Big Sur Version 11.7. >> Description: >> >> See «37.1. The Schema» >> (https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/infoschema-schema.html): >> >> « >> This schema automatically exists in all databases. The owner of this schema is the initial database user in the cluster,and that user naturally has all the privileges on this schema... >> » >> >> See this "pgsql-general" thread: >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8A2C8B1B-470B-42F9-9694-C1EDDAC06266@yugabyte.com. >> >> It concluded with the decision the the proper term for the role that the thread discusses is "bootstrap superuser". Theproper term should therefore be used consistently throughout the PG docs. > > Yeah, we’ve come to an agreement on terminology but there is work to be done to fix up the documentation to match. I’vegot a thread out here somewhere with a first pass at it. I’ve flagged this report to incorporate into the second pass. Whether that patch is ultimately deemed a back-patchable bug fix hasn’t been discussed though I’m mostly figuring itwill be a v16 improvement only. I’m not pushing to get something out before the next minor release in any case. Thanks. No rush, of course.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: