Re: Postgresql backend to perform vacuum automatically
От | mlw |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgresql backend to perform vacuum automatically |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C852F5A.225E57E9@mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgresql backend to perform vacuum automatically (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgresql backend to perform vacuum automatically
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > mlw wrote: > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > > Yes, I am seeing only zeros too. Jan? > > > > > > > > Did you turn on statistics gathering? See the Admin Guide's discussion > > > > of database monitoring. > > > > > > Oops, now I remember. Those are off by default and only the query > > > string is on by default. Thanks. > > > > This raises the question, by turning these on, does that affect database > > performance? > > > > If so, it may not be the answer for a selective vacuum. > > > > If they do not affect performance, then why have them off? > > I think Jan said 2-3%. If we can get autovacuum from it, it would be a > win to keep it on all the time, perhaps. Assuming that the statistics get updated: How often should the sats table be queried? What sort of configurability would be needed?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: