Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
От | Fernando Nasser |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3C798F4F.58F15C90@redhat.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item (Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb, > > > > perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user" > > > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user" > > A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here. > > Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed > earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the > grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and > having the shift/reduce issues resolved... > The syntax of the CREATE SCHEMA SQL standard command is CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION userid Shouldn't we be using CREATE DATABASE AUTHORIZATION userid to be consistent? -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: